On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:11:33PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > martin f krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > > h. There are more rules as to when packages migrate from unstable to > > testing. > > i. You use both meanings of "priority" (changelog and control) > > without making it clear which one is meant. > > Furthermore, for testing propagation i'ts "urgency" that matters, isn't > it? Hi Frank, isnt that addressed by the tag "Urgency: Low|Medium|High"? > > And I've never read "ITO" as a tag for orphaning bug. Either one mails > to -devel (or wherever) saying that they intend to give away or orphan > some packages, but this isn't a bug, just conversation. In the BTS, I > think the tag is simply "O". > so, there is no 'bug' to the bts to orphan a package, simply a note to debian-devel? So folks are expected to troll it to pickup packages? ok. I will change the ITO to 'read about orphanded package on debian-devel'. -Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! (__) (oo) /------\/ / | || * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ ...."Have you mooed today?"...
Description: Digital signature