[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: all new Debian diagram - now with less chaos!

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:11:33PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> wrote:
> > h. There are more rules as to when packages migrate from unstable to
> >    testing.
> > i. You use both meanings of "priority" (changelog and control)
> >    without making it clear which one is meant.
> Furthermore, for testing propagation i'ts "urgency" that matters, isn't
> it? 

Hi Frank,
isnt that addressed by the tag "Urgency: Low|Medium|High"?

> And I've never read "ITO" as a tag for orphaning bug. Either one mails
> to -devel (or wherever) saying that they intend to give away or orphan
> some packages, but this isn't a bug, just conversation. In the BTS, I
> think the tag is simply "O".

so, there is no 'bug' to the bts to orphan a package, simply a note to
debian-devel? So folks are expected to troll it to pickup packages?
ok. I will change the ITO to 'read about orphanded package on
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!

 / |    ||
*  /\---/\
   ~~   ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: