On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 05:34:38PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 02:27 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > Hi debianista,
> >
> > after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of
> > madduck, I had some time to redo my diagram to produce a totally new
> > concept. any comment appreciated.
> >
> > http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/newdebian.png
> > http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/newdebian.dia
>
> Not to find fault with something that will clear up much confusion in
> the Debian Sphere of Being, but I am wonder where the contributions back
> to upstream are in this picture?
Hi Greg,
in my original diagram (http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/debian.png), I
included an indication of that. I will be including it in this one, but
have not done so yet.
>
> Where should it go? I don't know. Debian is one of the largest
> contributors to upstream(s), with bug-fixes, feature adds and
> improvements in code cleanliness. As well as being upstream for many
> things.
>
> Also, shouldn't it also be noted the distributions that are based on
> Debian that give-back to upstream (like Ubuntu and the plugin-dev and
> pmount thing).
woun't that be out of the scope of my diagram?
> Given I don't know if it warrants, as it would be a user
> submission with patch to the DBTS.
>
> Other than that, I think its very good looking, I don't have the
> knowledge to judge whether it is accurate of not.
> --
thanks for the input.
cheers,
Kev
--
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
(__)
(oo)
/------\/
/ | ||
* /\---/\
~~ ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature