Re: Linux Core Consortium

[Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>]

Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> writes:

> * Brian Nelson 
>
> | Anyone, developer or non-developer, can help fix toolchain problems.
> | However, the only people who can work on the testing-security
> | autobuilders are ... the security team and the ftp-masters?  What's
> | that, a handful of people?  With a bottleneck like that, isn't that a
> | much more important issue?
>
> The problem is not the autobuilder infrastructure per se.  It is that
> testing and unstable are largely in sync (!).  This, combinded with the
> fact that testing must not have versions newer than unstable (they
> will then be rejected) means testing-security wouldn't work at the
> moment.

How is that different from testing-proposed-updates?

And why is testing-proposed-updates infrastructure still lacking 2
buildds?

MfG
        Goswin