[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Linux Core Consortium

On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> writes:
> > The problem is not the autobuilder infrastructure per se.  It is that
> > testing and unstable are largely in sync (!).  This, combinded with the
> > fact that testing must not have versions newer than unstable (they
> > will then be rejected) means testing-security wouldn't work at the
> > moment.
> How is that different from testing-proposed-updates?

Because they're ussualy for fixing bugs in testing where there is
an other version in unstable?  Why else would you be using


Reply to: