Re: Linux Core Consortium
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen <email@example.com> writes:
> > The problem is not the autobuilder infrastructure per se. It is that
> > testing and unstable are largely in sync (!). This, combinded with the
> > fact that testing must not have versions newer than unstable (they
> > will then be rejected) means testing-security wouldn't work at the
> > moment.
> How is that different from testing-proposed-updates?
Because they're ussualy for fixing bugs in testing where there is
an other version in unstable? Why else would you be using