Hi!
I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
I'd like to veto here.
I have filed an ITA on gif2png:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261583
I have package a new version and request an RFS 3 times:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/07/msg00416.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/08/msg00048.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2004/08/msg00011.html
A ready package, that solve this bug is already available.
Why did QA-group adopt this package instead to sponsor my upload?
This means unnecessary work for me to build a new package and double
work on package at all! Are there no more important things to do for
QA-team?
The same was happen on my first package txt2pdbdoc and this sucks.
Or should I post any RFS on QA-list that QA-team get known my work?
What are next steps?
Could QA-team revert their package and sponsor my one or have I build
a new one?
Regards,
Erik
--
www.ErikSchanze.de *********************************************
Bitte keine HTML-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Maillimit: 1 MB *
* Linux-Info-Tag in Dresden, am 30. Oktober 2004 *
Info: http://www.linux-info-tag.de *
Attachment:
pgpT9xpG0YEKA.pgp
Description: signature