Re: miscfiles NMU?
Thomas Bushnell BSG <email@example.com> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> He fixed a borken Build-Depends-Indep which is a severe policy
>> violation. So it was release critical. Build-Depends(-Indep), if
>> present, MUST be correct.
> What are you talking about? miscfiles has no Build-Depends.
>From the changelog:
- Build-Depend-Indep on the patch package;
| Packages must list any packages they require to build beyond those
| that are "build-essential" in the appropriate Build-Depends: fields.
Going by the changelog you faild to list patch in
Build-Depends-Indep. If you had no build depends so far it's a
violation of the sarge RC policy and not debian policy. But still RC.
Please don't revert that fix.
>> Do you have any technical objection to any of the fixes for
>> Closes: 147321 150264 152791 167493 175700 190347 249867 249867 249871 249879 249882 249897 250068
> Several of them, yes. Some of them are incorrect.
Thats a much better argument for reverting than "you didn't ask
me". You should have said so.