[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64



Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:

> Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
>> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
>
>>> course, it would be DFSG-compliant, but I guess that's not something
>>> you're too concerned about, eh?
>
>> It wouldn't. It would limit the useage which is not allowed.
>
>> And I couldn't care les about DFSG-compliance for those scripts. They
>> have nothing to do with the DFSG as they are.
>
> So, I'm just a random user of Debian and not directly involved in any of
> this, but since no one has made this point directly that I've seen....
>
> I'm sitting here mystified as to why you would even *want* to try to run a
> service for Debian on software that isn't DFSG-compliant, let alone say
> that it has nothing to do with the DFSG.  Doesn't that really miss the
> entire point?  The purpose of Debian is to build a Linux distribution
> based on free software, and the build system is pretty integral to the
> process of building Debian.

To see what is going on with the buildds.

Compare that to debian using google to search its webpages.

> Sure, if you release your scripts as free software, someone else can use
> them to do something you didn't want or anticipate.  Um... welcome to free
> software.  That is, to a large degree, the whole bloody *point*.  The DFSG
> exist because of the belief that we'll all be better off if we share
> software freely and openly even to the extent of letting other people fork
> our software packages.
>
> I can understand if you don't agree with this philosophy; certainly, not
> everyone does.  But if you don't, why would you want to be involved at all
> with a Linux distribution that's built around that philosophy as part of
> its core foundation?  Isn't that just a recipe for lots of personal
> frustration and head-butting?
>
> Please don't read any intended implications into my questions.  I'm not
> assuming some conclusion; I'm honestly baffled by your statement.

Because for those scripts and just those scripts it is not the right
philosophy the way they are now.


If you realy are intrested I can give you the script to draw the
graphs from local files. You can download a script to lookup packages
status from the url posted earlier in the flame. The part that
regulary downloads the arch-all.txt files you can do yourself. That is
probably all you want as non buildd person.

MfG
        Goswin



Reply to: