[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Description of tasks

On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 10:34:28AM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:

> > It will surprise you, but I'm neither a DD nor is buildd.net an official
> > part of Debian. So, what make you believe, you can extend the SC to outside
> > resources or people?
> well, you sure seem to want to be treated as a DD in every other way,


> you surely flame like a regular DD,

I would prefer to be not forced into flaming back. 

> you demand to be able to run an
> official buildd for Debian,

Is that a call to draw back my buildds? That would include 3-4 buildds and
several other machines that are available for DDs and used f.e. bei doko for
building gcc snapshots. 

> you scream loudly when you have problems
> communicating with the Debian FTP-master team. 

I believe that problems should be spoken out and should get solved. So,
what's wrong with pointing at problems?

> (And at least I am not surprised to see you not being a DD.  With your
>  attitude, I doubt you'll ever become one, either...)

No problem... as long as that Troup-thingie is in place, I don't *want* to
become a DD.

> > > Really, you should be willing to share your work freely with others
> > > with no strings attached.  If you aren't willing to do this, then
> > > perhaps you should reconsider whether you are really suited to
> > > participating with the development of free software in general and the
> > > Debian Project in particular.  We are working together, not against
> > > each other.
> > Really? Can you prove this? I'm really not convinced of that after this
> > thread. 
> You're using the distribution Debian, isn't that proof enough that
> people are working together? 


> A distribution of this size doesn't just
> spontaneously form out of nothing.  It requires a huge effort of team
> work.  Just consider the new debian-installer as a grand example of
> team work, or maybe the glibc-maintainance...

And there a signs that the team play does not work anymore... 

Ciao...              // 
      Ingo         \X/

Reply to: