Am 2004-05-26 11:14:02, schrieb Ben Armstrong: >I don't buy this. Why would it be impossible for processor firmwares? >Surely this is just an implementation detail. Processor firmwares would >land squarely in non-free. Installation disks including those firmwares >would be non-free. Those *choosing* to run Debian on a non-free >firmware could do so with non-free installation disks. What is the big >problem? Right, this is exactly what I mean... >With in Debian there is a blend of both. Any Debian developer can work >on non-free packages. That is their prerogative. Those packages just >won't be a part of Debian. Scary stories about how hypothetical evil >firmwares for CPUs could make Debian fade to irrelevance in the future >are FUD, plain and simple. ;-) >There is the same solution there always has been: keep the non-free >material out of Debian. Let the users make the choice. If they want to >use non-free, let them. But as for Debian main, it remains entirely >Free. Agree ! >Regards, >Ben Greetings Michelle -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature