Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
Andreas Barth <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow (email@example.com) [040219 16:25]:
> > Another point:
> > What changes when I opt for a public discussion? Does that just add a
> > flamewar that the nm-commitee has to follow and anoys them (like any
> > extra work) or would that mean I have to get 2/3 positive votes from
> > DDs to overrule James? The effect of opting for a public discussion
> > are unclear.
Is there a weak, strong and absolute acceptance too?
> The effect is quite clear: It adds a flameware, and the decision is
> still be made by the NM-commitee.
> However, that doesn't change the right of the DDs that they may
> override any decision with a GR, according to Section 4.1 of the
I think if it ever came to that Debian has bigger problems than an NM
not getting accepted.