[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.

Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> writes:

> * Goswin von Brederlow (brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) [040219 16:25]:
> > Another point:
> > What changes when I opt for a public discussion? Does that just add a
> > flamewar that the nm-commitee has to follow and anoys them (like any
> > extra work) or would that mean I have to get 2/3 positive votes from
> > DDs to overrule James? The effect of opting for a public discussion
> > are unclear.

Is there a weak, strong and absolute acceptance too?
> The effect is quite clear: It adds a flameware, and the decision is
> still be made by the NM-commitee.
> However, that doesn't change the right of the DDs that they may
> override any decision with a GR, according to Section 4.1 of the
> constitution.

I think if it ever came to that Debian has bigger problems than an NM
not getting accepted.
> Cheers,
> Andi


Reply to: