Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
Goswin van Brederlow wrote:
>Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:13:17 +0100, Ingo Juergensmann
>> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 04:55:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> >> No, it's in the spirit of "You can't bully anyone around, so don't
>> >> waste our time trying getting the DPL to dismiss delegates when
>> >> you're not either willing or able to pass through n-m.".
>> > Then please tell us what Goswin can do to pass n-m?
>> Convince the DAM of his worthiness?
>He is not communicating. I've been doing work for debian for a long
>time, a hell of a lot more work than the Joe Average DDs created last
>year. So it can't be my will to work.
>And nobody complained about the quality of my work so far. The only
>thing could be that I'm not the best at choosing my words and thus
>stamp on peoples feet from time to time.
Like Branden Robinson, Anthony Towns, and many other Debian Developers.
Particularly Anthony Towns. So that's not a reasonable reason.
> But I allways had a more
>positive than negative reaction overall in such cases. So it can't
>be my ability to do the work.
>I'm willing and able and have demonstrated both over the years. So
>what do I have to change to convince him? Tell me and I will try to
>archive that or go away and give up on Debian.
IMNSHO, this requires a public response from either the DAM or the DPL. We're