Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
Nathanael Nerode <email@example.com> writes:
> Goswin van Brederlow wrote:
> >Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:13:17 +0100, Ingo Juergensmann
> <email@example.com> said:
> >> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 04:55:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >> >> No, it's in the spirit of "You can't bully anyone around, so don't
> >> >> waste our time trying getting the DPL to dismiss delegates when
> >> >> you're not either willing or able to pass through n-m.".
> >> > Then please tell us what Goswin can do to pass n-m?
> >> Convince the DAM of his worthiness?
> >> manoj
> >He is not communicating. I've been doing work for debian for a long
> >time, a hell of a lot more work than the Joe Average DDs created last
> >year. So it can't be my will to work.
> >And nobody complained about the quality of my work so far. The only
> >thing could be that I'm not the best at choosing my words and thus
> >stamp on peoples feet from time to time.
> Like Branden Robinson, Anthony Towns, and many other Debian Developers.
> Particularly Anthony Towns. So that's not a reasonable reason.
> > But I allways had a more
> >positive than negative reaction overall in such cases. So it can't
> >be my ability to do the work.
> >I'm willing and able and have demonstrated both over the years. So
> >what do I have to change to convince him? Tell me and I will try to
> >archive that or go away and give up on Debian.
> > Goswin
> IMNSHO, this requires a public response from either the DAM or the DPL. We're
There has been a responce of some kind, also James claims this thread
wasn't the cause. I have been rejected.
I'm not sure if the rejection mail is archived anywhere public but I
don't mind making it public if you want to read it.
Or are mails from an official Debian representative (here DAM) still