[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.

Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:08:11AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
>> He said "inappropriate from a non-developer".  That is the part I'm
>> reacting to.  
> The only people who have any say in how Debian acts is Debian members,
> and the people they as individuals listen to.


    Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software

    We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free-software
    community. We will place their interests first in our priorities. 

How can you say you will place interest of people not having any say
in how Debian acts first in your priorities?

Please, amend the Debian social contract, if it does not reflect

> It's inappropriate for a non-developer to upload debs to the archive too,
> even if that's the exact same package that a developer might upload. Your
> reasoning above isn't valid;

Is there no difference between altering the content of Debian and
expressing a point of view about how Debian works?

> even when we're interested in non-developers views
> generally.

This means in plain text: we are not interested in non-developers view
here. Please, amend the Debian social contract, if it does not reflect

Mathieu Roy

  | General Homepage:           http://yeupou.coleumes.org/             |
  | Computing Homepage:         http://alberich.coleumes.org/           |
  | Not a native english speaker:                                       |
  |     http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english  |

Reply to: