Re: gcc as optional
Goswin von Brederlow writes:
> Santiago Vila <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Santiago Vila <email@example.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > What we can do is not to repeat what we did in woody, when we shipped
> > > > two different gcc releases of standard priority (gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0).
> > >
> > > gcc 3.2 and 3.3 is shipped.
> > No, only gcc-3.3 is standard. gcc-3.2 is optional, so we are
> > fortunately not repeating what we did in woody.
> Depending on the arch. hppa still uses 3.2, right? Is gcc-3.2 realy
> removed from debootstraps list on all archs that have gcc-3.3
at least on all architectures gcc point to gcc-3.3.