[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcc as optional

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:

> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
> > What we can do is not to repeat what we did in woody, when we shipped
> > two different gcc releases of standard priority (gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0).
> gcc 3.2 and 3.3 is shipped.

No, only gcc-3.3 is standard. gcc-3.2 is optional, so we are
fortunately not repeating what we did in woody.

Reply to: