Re: gcc as optional
Santiago Vila <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Santiago Vila <email@example.com> writes:
> > > What we can do is not to repeat what we did in woody, when we shipped
> > > two different gcc releases of standard priority (gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0).
> > gcc 3.2 and 3.3 is shipped.
> No, only gcc-3.3 is standard. gcc-3.2 is optional, so we are
> fortunately not repeating what we did in woody.
Depending on the arch. hppa still uses 3.2, right? Is gcc-3.2 realy
removed from debootstraps list on all archs that have gcc-3.3