Re: search-citeseer_0.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Otavio Salvador <email@example.com> wrote:
> [ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the
> opinion of others developpers ]
> James Troup <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> This package is dubiously small enough as it is without being split
>> into two. There's no need to separate the 2k .el file into a separate
>> package. If depending on emacs bothers you, make it a suggests.
> Yes, the packages is small *but* IMHO this should be splited in two
> since the -el package can but not used. Other issue is the last
> depends of emacsen and someone can doesn't like have an emacsen
> installed in machine.
If that "bothers you, make it a suggests" instead of a depends.
What point am I missing?
Hey, da ist ein Ballonautomat auf der Toilette!
Unofficial _Debian-packages_ of latest unstable _tin_