Re: search-citeseer_0.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the
opinion of others developpers ]
James Troup <ftpmaster@debian.org> writes:
> This package is dubiously small enough as it is without being split
> into two. There's no need to separate the 2k .el file into a separate
> package. If depending on emacs bothers you, make it a suggests.
Yes, the packages is small *but* IMHO this should be splited in two
since the -el package can but not used. Other issue is the last
depends of emacsen and someone can doesn't like have an emacsen
installed in machine.
- -rw-r--r-- 1 otavio otavio 4.1K Oct 4 16:58 search-citeseer-el_0.1-1_all.deb
- -rw-r--r-- 1 otavio otavio 2.9K Oct 4 16:58 search-citeseer_0.1-1.diff.gz
- -rw-r--r-- 1 otavio otavio 610 Oct 4 16:58 search-citeseer_0.1-1.dsc
- -rw-r--r-- 1 otavio otavio 5.4K Oct 4 16:58 search-citeseer_0.1-1_all.deb
- -rw-r--r-- 1 otavio otavio 1.2K Oct 4 16:58 search-citeseer_0.1-1_i386.changes
- -rw-r--r-- 1 otavio otavio 11K Oct 4 16:56 search-citeseer_0.1.orig.tar.gz
I think the current package is ready for inclusion in Debian Project
and really like if you reconsider your decision. If we doesn't want
small packages in Debian, please include this in Debian Policy and
then I'll agree without asking but this is not the case.
Thanks in Advance,
Otavio
- --
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
- ---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
- ---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE/jr5JLqiZQEml+FURAvjGAJ9FbITI7GzMxfTnUmouMSaqdBRNPgCaA9+C
QJY4l0fdmRS/lKn1tNhwf18=
=vmyL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: