[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: search-citeseer_0.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hash: SHA1

[ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the
opinion of others developpers ]

James Troup <ftpmaster@debian.org> writes:

> This package is dubiously small enough as it is without being split
> into two.  There's no need to separate the 2k .el file into a separate
> package.  If depending on emacs bothers you, make it a suggests.

Yes, the packages is small *but* IMHO this should be splited in two
since the -el package can but not used. Other issue is the last
depends of emacsen and someone can doesn't like have an emacsen
installed in machine.

- -rw-r--r--    1 otavio   otavio       4.1K Oct  4 16:58 search-citeseer-el_0.1-1_all.deb
- -rw-r--r--    1 otavio   otavio       2.9K Oct  4 16:58 search-citeseer_0.1-1.diff.gz
- -rw-r--r--    1 otavio   otavio        610 Oct  4 16:58 search-citeseer_0.1-1.dsc
- -rw-r--r--    1 otavio   otavio       5.4K Oct  4 16:58 search-citeseer_0.1-1_all.deb
- -rw-r--r--    1 otavio   otavio       1.2K Oct  4 16:58 search-citeseer_0.1-1_i386.changes
- -rw-r--r--    1 otavio   otavio        11K Oct  4 16:56 search-citeseer_0.1.orig.tar.gz

I think the current package is ready for inclusion in Debian Project
and really like if you reconsider your decision. If we doesn't want
small packages in Debian, please include this in Debian Policy and
then I'll agree without asking but this is not the case.

Thanks in Advance,

- -- 
      O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
- ---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
- ---------------------------------------------
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>


Reply to: