Re: [PROPOSAL] Debian Release Plan
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 04:38:37PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:06:39PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:50:15PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > If there are RC bugs to packages that 'release-status-sarge' depends
> > > > on, it won't go to testing...
> > >
> > > Of course it would, unless it had a versioned dependency that could
> > > not be met. And how would you know in which version the bug would be
> > > fixed?
> >
> > 'release-status-sarge' is just a package to monitor the work to be done
> > to have a stable release.
> >
> > It does not matter to know in which version the bug will be fixed. What
> > I want for sarge is emacs21 ( >= 21.2 ) so if every RC bugs are closed
> > with 21.3 or 21.4, the dependency >=21.2 is ok.
>
> And what if the version in testing has an RC bug? "release-status-sarge"
> says everything is OK.
Do we even know which packages in sarge have RC bugs? The last time I
looked when you close a bug with an upload to sid it closes it entirely
still. So we don't really have a good idea of how many RC bugs exist in
sarge, only how many are in sid.
Chris
Reply to: