Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003

[Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>]

On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 01:31:12PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:

> So, it's fairly accurrate to say that if DAM were looked at as a
> maintainer his actions and documented reasoning so far would be consider
> recalcitrant.  That is if any DD treated their package maintainence the
> way DAM treats NM queue processing, maintainence of the package could be
> removed from them.

Perhaps; but if a package maintainer is not maintaining his package, and
no one else is willing to take over maintenance of it either, the usual
outcome is a request to remove the package from the archive...

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgpLUQunINc0W.pgp
Description: PGP signature