[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NM non-process

* Roland Mas (lolando@debian.org) [030721 17:50]:
> Not trying to be apologetic to anyone, but I'd like to point out that
> I've heard too many reports of new maintainers coming in only to
> maintain their one package for six months then vanish totally, thus
> "showing deplorable communication skills" and adding "tracking MIA
> people" to the already large amount of work the QA group has to deal
> with.  The MIA problem is significant enough that NM might be the only
> way to tackle with it seriously.  That means taking time to examine
> applications.

True. However, that doesn't get better with people wanting to do
QA-work are not allowed to become DD for a too long time.

   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to: