[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mailcap next step

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:35:33PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
> W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 15:23, Wouter Verhelst pisze: 
> > I fail to see why it would be bad. It's not perfect, but that's far from
> > the same thing. Moreover, I think your ideas would make things worse,
> > rather than better.
> It's not perfect. Importand bugs are for me:
> * doesn't allow to choose what program use

Yes it does. Create a ~/.mailcap with the application of your choice for
a given MIME-type at the top.

My suggestion of a front-end was to create some application that would
help $USER to manage ~/.mailcap.

> * it skip more than one application for one type

That's actually the same thing as above, unless I don't understand what
you mean.

> Our task is to think, when it would be good, and what we're gonna do.
> Of course, we can leave it as it is now, but then we won't go further in
> making Debian better and more and more useful.

Please point me to where I said we should leave things as they are.

Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org

"An expert can usually spot the difference between a fake charge and a
full one, but there are plenty of dead experts." 
  -- National Geographic Channel, in a documentary about large African beasts.

Attachment: pgpf3FZO04GES.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: