[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PROPOSAL] debian-lisp mail list

Matthew Danish wrote:
> Yes; it is the Common Lisp packages which have a coordinated controller
> system.  However, Lam and I agreed to change the proposal to
> ``debian-common-lisp'' instead, because ``debian-lisp'' could be
> construed for other Lisp dialects.

I'm happy with either debian-common-lisp or debian-lisp. Given the
relativley smaller number of people using non-CL lisps, I expect the
the non-CL lisp traffic on a debian-lisp list would not interfer with
efficient CL discussions.

In either case, I think the list will be well-used to the benefit of
Debian and its users and I continue to strongly support this
proposal. I suppose if I had to choose between the two, I'd lean
towards debian-common-lisp but would be glad to have a debian-lisp
list with other non-CL users.

       Kevin Rosenberg        |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
  http://b9.com/debian.html   | : :' :      The  universal
  GPG signed and encrypted    | `. `'      Operating System
     messages accepted.       |   `-    http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: pgpu5l9R4nrt9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: