On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 13:41, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 13:33, Patrick McFarland wrote: > > On 26-Feb-2003, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > > Patrick: > > gpg: BAD signature from "Patrick McFarland (Diablo-D3) <unknown@panax.com>" > > This is evolution 1.2.2 here. You're using mutt 1.5.3. Yet another > mutt/evolution problem? I thought these were finally solved by evolution > 1.2.2... > Nope, they just closed the bug and decided not to fix it. Evolution rewrites (yes REWRITES) quoted-printable e-mails before verifying them. That's just wrong. It separates the mail, then decodes the parts. When it comes to verify, it recodes the signed part again. Mutt and Evolution encode quoted-printable mails slightly differently. I can understand their upset that the PGP/MIME standard says you sign the *encoded* part, rather than the decoded part; but that's no reason to simply write brain-dead code. Scott -- Scott James Remnant Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange http://netsplit.com/ things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part