Re: initrd-tools

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: initrd-tools
From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 04:08:28 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030217030828.GA8951@wonderland.linux.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030216235302.GA17317@snoopy.apana.org.au>
References: <[🔎] 20030216022326.GA28235@dat.etsit.upm.es> <[🔎] E18kF33-0001w2-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <[🔎] 20030216095259.B7607@zombie.inka.de> <[🔎] 200302161122.01137.russell@coker.com.au> <[🔎] 20030216103706.GA11327@gondor.apana.org.au> <[🔎] 20030216235302.GA17317@snoopy.apana.org.au>

On Feb 17, Brian May <bam@debian.org> wrote:

 >How will initramfs (in Linux 2.5.x) affect (if there is any change)
 >initrd-tools?
In the first phase nothing will happen, then it will become useless
(because everything will be done in the kernel ramfs).

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Reply to:

References:
- How should this issue be handled, should it be taken to the Technical Ctte?
  - From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
- Re: How should this issue be handled, should it be taken to the Technical Ctte?
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: How should this issue be handled, should it be taken to the Technical Ctte?
  - From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
- Re: How should this issue be handled, should it be taken to the Technical Ctte?
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: How should this issue be handled, should it be taken to the Technical Ctte?
  - From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: initrd-tools
  - From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: mICQ roundup
Next by Date: Re: language-specific packages
Previous by thread: Re: initrd-tools
Next by thread: Re: How should this issue be handled, should it be taken to the Technical Ctte?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread