Re: Suggested press release in reaction to RHAT dropping sparc and alpha
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 02:59:37PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> yada yada yada... I don't need the advocacy. Try to remember context.
> This is about demonstrable factual advantages in the form of a press
> release. Spinning off into all sorts of tangents like "people don't need
> contracts anyway" isn't relevant.
I agree that contracts are of little relevance to this thread, but why
then did you introduce them into the issue with your post:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:45:21AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> No, we end of life them arbitrarily when we don't feel like working on
> them anymore. I'm not sure that's a distinct advantage. (Or are you
> aware of any contractual obligation for debian to continue working on
> sparc and alpha in perpetuity?)
> Mike Stone
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | firstname.lastname@example.org
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 | http://www.e-advies.info