Re: Another pbuilder run finished
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 09:18:56PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 09:59:38PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > I don't know for sure, but X11 and teTeX come to mind. Those two are
> > rather nasty beasts in terms of CPU/space requirements when building.
> > Glibc might be a bit nasty as well, though it's probably not as bad.
> glibc only took 17:49.77 total and 400mb to build here.
Is it possible to tune pbuilder to use make -j x ? We have an
experimental openmosix cluster that could use erm, "load testing".
Riku Voipio | firstname.lastname@example.org |
kirkkonummentie 33 | +358 40 8476974 --+--
02140 Espoo | |
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. |