Re: Automated package testing (Re: Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Automated package testing (Re: Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?)
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 11:47:52 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021214164752.GA26499@mizar.alcor.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Brian May <bam@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021214011435.GI13385@snoopy.apana.org.au>
References: <[🔎] 20021212000837.GC5293@thanes.org> <[🔎] 20021212013529.GA24188@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net> <[🔎] 200212111746.57828.shalehperry@attbi.com> <[🔎] 1039660986.22203.17.camel@space-ghost> <[🔎] 20021212225302.GB2186@snoopy.apana.org.au> <[🔎] 20021213040358.GB9083@mizar.alcor.net> <[🔎] 20021213144818.GB4607@wile.excelhustler.com> <[🔎] 20021213153719.GB21885@mizar.alcor.net> <[🔎] 20021214011435.GI13385@snoopy.apana.org.au>

On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 12:14:35PM +1100, Brian May wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:37:20AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > It also does not require a kernel patch (though the skas patch will improve
> > performance greatly).
> 
> What does the SKAS patch do?

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=fa.ia69pmv.e4qnq1%40ifi.uio.no

-- 
 - mdz

Reply to:

References:
- Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?
  - From: Marek Habersack <grendel@debian.org>
- Re: Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?
  - From: Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <shalehperry@attbi.com>
- Re: Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?
  - From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?
  - From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
- Automated package testing (Re: Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?)
  - From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
- Re: Automated package testing (Re: Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?)
  - From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
- Re: Automated package testing (Re: Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?)
  - From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
- Re: Automated package testing (Re: Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?)
  - From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: gsview
Next by Date: Bug#173050: ITP: png2ico -- utility to convert PNG files to Windows icon resource files.
Previous by thread: Re: Automated package testing (Re: Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?)
Next by thread: Re: Is Sid for broken stuff? Is it too much to ask for testing the packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread