Shyamal Prasad <shyamal.prasad@sbcglobal.net> writes: > Its just that I find it vaguely funny that packaging XEmacs could be > controversial. It's not without precedent... licensing problems in the Emacs past are the reason that the FSF requires paperwork for changes they install. -- Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - In a variety of flavors! The doctor gave me a clean bill of health. . . and an expensive one!