[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal - non-free software removal



Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Nov 14, Brian Nelson <nelson@bignachos.com> wrote:

 >Specifically which non-free packages don't have DFSG-compliant
 >replacements?
From the vrms output on my workstation:

acroread                  Adobe Acrobat Reader: Portable Document Format
doc-html-w3               [EBOOK-DEV] Recommendations of the W3
graphviz                  a set of graph drawing tools including a web service
lha                       lzh archiver
unarj                     arj unarchive utility
unrar                     Unarchiver for .rar files
xmame                     Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator

HTH, HAND.


I also have "ocaml-doc".

I see "ilisp" and "ilisp-doc" in vrms, although it looks like the
authors may consider GPL'ing it in the future:

  ILISP if freely redistributable. Eventually it may become part of GNU
  Emacs and it will in that case comply with the GPL.


Steve
dunham@cse.msu.edu



Reply to: