Re: Proposal - non-free software removal
"Peter" == Peter S Galbraith <Peter> writes:
>> So, are we moving XEmacs to non-free now? ;-)
Peter> XEmacs aren't immune to license fumbles. See
Peter> /usr/share/xemacs21/packages/lisp/ilisp/COPYING for
Peter> Yes, it might mean pulling that package from XEmacs and
Peter> getting the author to change the license (which is nearly
Peter> impossible for large projects that have changed hands many
Peter> times, and have accepted all sorts of patches).
Peter> You haven't addressed any of my points.
Sorry, I was just being facetious and irresponsible. I don't have a
strong opinion one way or the other on this non-free removal issue
(and I don't have a vote), I'm just average luser. Its just that I
find it vaguely funny that packaging XEmacs could be
controversial. Don't ask me to explain, I just do.
I'll be quiet.....