Re: Discussion - non-free software removal
>>"Branden" == Branden Robinson <email@example.com> writes:
Branden> So you have changed your mind that user confusion about what
Branden> is and is not part of "Debian" imposes a cost upon us? Or
Branden> do you feel that the utility of even one package in
Branden> non-free, no matter what it is, is a benefit that outweighs
Branden> that cost?
Not quite. I think, though, I have changed my mind about the
proposed solution. I think we do need to more strongly brand the
non-free section, and what is Debian.
Incidentally, if packages were indeed signed, we could only
have Debian distribution packages signed; we can have apt/dpkg remind
people that packages are non free, we can add a header that points
to closes free replacement, which can be presented to people.
Living your life is a task so difficult, it has never been attempted
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C