Re: Discussion - non-free software removal
>>"Branden" == Branden Robinson <email@example.com> writes:
Branden> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:13:12AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> In the long term, non-fre would wither on its own accord, as
>> free software continues to make inroads into the mainstream, and we
>> would be at the same spot without making people who like free
>> software but must use non-free software jump through hoops.
Branden> How far must it wither before we decide it's not longer useful? To
When it is empty? ;-)
But really, do we need to make such a determination, if
non-free is indeed slowly dying?
Branden> Why don't we let our BTS be used for tracking issues with Microsoft
Branden> Office, as I understand that there is no such publicly-available
I think MS lawyers shall object. Espescially if we leave the
BTS open to anyone to lok at the flaws recorded.
The price one pays for pursuing any profession, or calling, is an
intimate knowledge of its ugly side. -- James Baldwin
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C