Re: Discussion - non-free software removal
>>"Branden" == Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:
Branden> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:13:12AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> In the long term, non-fre would wither on its own accord, as
>> free software continues to make inroads into the mainstream, and we
>> would be at the same spot without making people who like free
>> software but must use non-free software jump through hoops.
Branden> How far must it wither before we decide it's not longer useful? To
Branden> zero?
When it is empty? ;-)
But really, do we need to make such a determination, if
non-free is indeed slowly dying?
Branden> Why don't we let our BTS be used for tracking issues with Microsoft
Branden> Office, as I understand that there is no such publicly-available
Branden> resource?
I think MS lawyers shall object. Espescially if we leave the
BTS open to anyone to lok at the flaws recorded.
manoj
--
The price one pays for pursuing any profession, or calling, is an
intimate knowledge of its ugly side. -- James Baldwin
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: