On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 01:44:56AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > No, I'm really not. Contrary to popular belief, this list isn't for the > flamewar of the week, it's for *Debian development*. The -legal list > was created precisely to make sure licensing discussions didn't get in > the way of that. Thread drift has happened as it always does, but the thrust of my remarks has been to offer advice about the prudence of using BitKeeper *as a development tool* under the gratis license to my fellow Debian Developers. I posted as much of an exegesis of the BK gratis license as I have any plans to do on debian-devel-announce already, and that was only a means to the above end, to justify my urging of caution. Please disregard this message if you weren't actually complaining about my messages in particular. -- G. Branden Robinson | Convictions are more dangerous Debian GNU/Linux | enemies of truth than lies. branden@debian.org | -- Friedrich Nietzsche http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpOA4yM9AQJP.pgp
Description: PGP signature