Re: #127986: vim: Processes found running away. * Tags: moreinfo; 158 days old.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 04:26:41PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 06:48:14PM +0000, Jason Lunz wrote:
> > All of which is irrelevant to my point, which is that you can easily
> > reproduce bug #127986 by sending SIGTERM a few times to a running gvim.
> > Unless that's a different vim busyloop bug.
> I must be lucky then, because I can't make it happen. The sure-fire method
That's a pretty weird test case described in that bug report.
I suggest that this bug is 'minor' at best.
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org