Re: <joke/>Debian secure by default (was Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd)
Manuel A. Fernández Montecelo <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Ter, 2002-05-21 at 18:51, Niels Möller wrote:
> > I hope there will be a sensible list of release criteria, prepared
> > with input from both the release manager the hurd folks, when Debian
> > GNU/Hurd gets closer to release, and putting FW-tools on that list
> > sounds pretty nonsensical. But I'm happy to postpone that discussion
> > until the list is being prepared and release getting closer.
> i agree. well, i really *don't know* if FW-tools are "nonsensical".
Please note that he didn't say that. He was talking about putting them
on the list.
Wolfgang Jährling <firstname.lastname@example.org> \\ http://stdio.cjb.net/
Debian GNU/Hurd user && Debian GNU/Linux user \\ http://www.gnu.org/
The Hurd Hacking Guide: http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hacking-guide/
["We're way ahead of you here. The Hurd has always been on the ]
[ cutting edge of not being good for anything." -- Roland McGrath ]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org