Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 07:34:48PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> And there are still enough people who run some non-free OS which is
> more insecure than GNU/Hurd.
Personally, i am not interested in any of those non-free OS's, and i am
barely concerend about the non-Debian distributions.
Debian (using a linux, bsd, or gnumach/l4 (micro)kernel) should be
``Secure by default.'' if this means that no firewalling -> no debian
release, then so be it.
i do know that the hurd uses a different privledge mechanism than
linux uses, even if i do not understand the details. that is
i am not subscribed to debian-hurd, hence the To:
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org