Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

["John H. Robinson, IV" <jhriv@ucsd.edu>]

On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 07:34:48PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> 
> And there are still enough people who run some non-free OS which is
> more insecure than GNU/Hurd.

so?

Personally, i am not interested in any of those non-free OS's, and i am
barely concerend about the non-Debian distributions.

Debian (using a linux, bsd, or gnumach/l4 (micro)kernel) should be
``Secure by default.'' if this means that no firewalling -> no debian
release, then so be it.

i do know that the hurd uses a different privledge mechanism than
linux uses, even if i do not understand the details. that is
unimportant.

-john

i am not subscribed to debian-hurd, hence the To:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org