On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:32:50AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > > It's close. If it can reject the message with a different 550 based on > > what scanner tripped it, and one can configure a new scanner to do as I > > suggest, it's perfect. > > No, it doesn't reject E-Mails this way, but rather sends an error back > to the sender and the postmaster, and keeps a copy of the original > E-Mail. > > Could be changed, I guess, would that provide any benefits? I believe it would - mostly because it would allow you to write special filters that do specific things besides virus scanning (in this case, executable scanning, as I suggest..) -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net> I N33D MY G4M3Z, D00D!!!!111!! (Just ... don't ask) <Kensey> RMS for President??? <RelDrgn> ...or ESR, he wants a new job ;)
Attachment:
pgpPgS4KSw4u6.pgp
Description: PGP signature