Re: Virus Checking - COMPLETELY UNENCUMBERED!
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 19:48, Joseph Carter wrote:
> It's close. If it can reject the message with a different 550 based on
> what scanner tripped it, and one can configure a new scanner to do as I
> suggest, it's perfect.
No, it doesn't reject E-Mails this way, but rather sends an error back
to the sender and the postmaster, and keeps a copy of the original
Could be changed, I guess, would that provide any benefits?
Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org