Re: [ Request for Help ] Re: BTS improvements (was: Re: 88 Priority violations in woody
>>"David" == David Schmitt <david@schmitt.edv-bus.at> writes:
David> It'd be great if the PTS-functionality could be included into
David> the BTS proper. That would make it much easier for people to
David> become involved (or at least informed) in bugs for which they
David> care.
PTS == subscribe to a package/bug? Yes, I have that as a use
case already. (This is getting more work than I initially thought). I
would appreciate it if people submitted use cases/desired
interactions with the BTS to me off list, so that we have as complete
a set when it come to triage time.
manoj
--
This is, of course, totally uninformed specualation that I engage in
to help support my bias against such meddling... but there you have
it. Peter da Silva, speculating about why a computer program that had
been changed to do something he didn't approve of, didn't work
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: