On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 20:35, Daniel Lutz wrote:
> Hello
>
> I received the mail included below from the BTS. A mail
> sent to <89286-close@bugs.debian.org> marked bug #89286 as
> done. But the appropriate mail itself seems to be SPAM!
...
> ---------------------------------------
> Received: (at 89286-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2002 05:32:38 +0000
> >From mstsurvey@yahoo.com Wed May 01 00:32:38 2002
> Return-path: <mstsurvey@yahoo.com>
> Received: from murphy.debian.org [65.125.64.134]
> by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
> id 172mjG-0003m2-00; Wed, 01 May 2002 00:32:38 -0500
> Received: (qmail 26452 invoked from network); 1 May 2002 05:32:28 -0000
> Received: from 64-58-161-190.cbi.cox-oc.net (HELO yahoo.com) (64.58.161.190)
> by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 1 May 2002 05:32:28 -0000
> From: "Chris Nunez" <mstsurvey@yahoo.com>
> To: <89286-close@bugs.debian.org>
> Subject: Introducing MultiSensit SDK
> Sender: "Chris Nunez" <mstsurvey@yahoo.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:38:26 -0700
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Message-Id: <E172mjG-0003m2-00@master.debian.org>
> Delivered-To: 89286-close@bugs.debian.org
>
> <html>
>
> <body aLink=#000000 bgColor=#336699 leftMargin=0 link=#000000 text=#000000
> topMargin=0 vLink=#000000 marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">
>
> <center>
> <br>
>
> <table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" width="650" height="400">
> <tr>
> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" align="center">
> <img src="http://www.mstcorporation.com/body.jpg";><br>
> <font face="arial,helvetica" size="2">
> <a href="http://www.mstcorporation.com";>www.mstcorporation.com</a><br>
> <a
> href="mailto:info@mstcorporation.com";>info@mstcorporation.com</a><br>
Well, there should be enough information here to identify them. If they
were in British jurisdiction, I think we could make a case for a
criminal prosecution under British law for unlawfully interfering with a
computer system.
The website is hosted by Verio, Inc. in Colorado, USA, and the mail sent
through another US ISP: Cox Communications, Inc in California. Is there
anything in US Federal or state law that would support a prosecution for
interfering with a computer, or maybe for criminal damage? Or perhaps
we could email the spammer with a demand for compensation?
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
"Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not."
Romans 12:14
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part