[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [ Request for Help ] Re: BTS improvements (was: Re: 88 Priority violations in woody

>>"Adam" == Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> writes:

 Adam> This is correct.  I'm not asking for incremental fixes to the
 Adam> existing code base.

 Adam> I want to start out with a completely fresh system, that has
 Adam> all the same features as the current one, has the same
 Adam> interface, but ends up being easier to maintain and program.

	Hmm.  As an exercise, I've started to put togther a UML use
 case document for the BTS, and I'll try and document all the use
 cases we already have.

	Lets see if this formal design stuff really works in a free
 software world ;-)

 "My husband said it was him or the cat ... I miss him sometimes."
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: