Re: fun with libgal
email@example.com (Takuo KITAME) cum veritate scripsit:
> JU> Takuo, what was your opinion about not naming "gal" source package
> JU> with version numbers ?
> I don't want to maintain old libraries.
> If it is really needed, I'll do.
> But almost packages depends on gal can be rebuild with latest gal.
> I think old gal is not so needed.
You can orphan old packages, and people who care about old ones
can maintain it.
It will add a workload in that one has to ask for removal of
old libgal when it is no longer used.
And also another change on libgal part would be necessary:
libgal-dev -> libgalXX-dev
Thinking that some people are doing static links,
it would be better to keep old libraries around.
firstname.lastname@example.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4