Re: fun with libgal

[kitame@northeye.org (Takuo KITAME)]

>>>>> In article <[🔎] 20020124102902.6a297c73.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>,
>>>>> "JU" == Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> wrote...:
JU> Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jose@jaimedelamo.eu.org> cum veritate scripsit:

JU> >   The problem with libgal is not only trying to follow it, and have to
JU> >  recompile a new package each time a new libgal is uploaded in Debian,
JU> >  but also that as libgal changes from time to time the API, I can face
JU> >  one day with a libgalxx which does not match the API of my package
JU> >  (what, btw, has yet happened with Ximian Setup Tools 0.6.0)

JU> Takuo, what was your opinion about not naming "gal" source package
JU> with version numbers ?

I don't want to maintain old libraries.
If it is really needed, I'll do.
But almost packages depends on gal can be rebuild with latest gal.
I think old gal is not so needed.

-- 
Takuo KITAME.