[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fixed, I think

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 20:12:57 -0200
Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org> wrote:

> > BTW you have restarted sawfish since the last upgrade ?
> the 7th December release? sure.. I even turned off the computer after
> that.... no one else is still having the bug? it may be something
> specific to my system, thus not being a real bug... though I don't
> recall doing different things with gtk this days

After reading the changelog  for gtk, it might be something there.

After 7 Dec, I had a very unstable icewm, until I rebuilt it against 
gtk+1.2 1.2.10-8.

Anyone with similar problems?


gtk+1.2 (1.2.10-8) unstable; urgency=low

  * Fixed fails to purge cleanly (closes: Bug#122745)
  * Note: Don't use --enable-debug=yes.
    it give us any strange problem.

 -- Akira TAGOH <tagoh@debian.org>  Fri,  7 Dec 2001 16:41:39 +0900

gtk+1.2 (1.2.10-7) unstable; urgency=low

  * Fixed remove obsolates conffiles by purge.
  * Fixed incorrect handling pointer in back-ported patch of gtkrc.
    (closes: Bug#122603)
  * Fixed search order for gtkrc again... (closes: Bug#121467)
  * Hmm I'm not sure, but pull down --enable-debug=minimum because
    make sure the cause of strange problem. so it's a default value.

 -- Akira TAGOH <tagoh@debian.org>  Thu,  6 Dec 2001 23:52:12 +0900

dancer@debian.org  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer

Reply to: