On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:13:00AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:49:09PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Do package descriptions change so regularly that translated descriptions
> > couldn't be submitted through the bug tracking system and included
> > in the next upload?
>
> That doesn't serve the purpose of hijacking pieces of the maintainer's
> package away from him, which, as you'll note, is the foundational
> premise of Michael Bramer's entire proposal.
>
> He doesn't want the maintainer involved at all, except to sit by
> helplessly and get flooded with emails notifying him that his package
> has been modified yet again.
sorry, branden.
1.) you speak only about the 1. proposal
2.) In the last proposal, I propose a way to include the translation
in the package. This proposal has some improvments and is more
exact.
3.) I don't flooded the maintainer.
4.) In this list and per PM I get some request about this mails. If I
hadn't support this mails, some maintainers whould have wept.
5.) I ask yesterday if we should stop this mails, and only some make this
request.
6.) I and some other translators get some 'Thanks' after the
notifcation mail. This is not wrong in all ways.
7.) This notification mails are like the mails from the BTS or from
katie
8.) This mails are not helplessly. I know some translators, who get
improvments from the maintainer.
9.) If you right and this mails are useless, we should put the
maintainer out of the loop. But you are wrong. Some maintainers
are very active and help the translators.
10.) Make you the request to send this all to the BTS?
If we make the translations, we have two excesses:
- we put the maintainer really in the loop (without a override file)
With this the maintainers get some mails from the translator
project. More like now. Now we only at the start, now we don't make
a real review process. Now we have only 10 languages.
In this case the maintainer must make the whole work after the
translation.
Sorry, but if some maintainers complain about this mails (without
real work on there site) now, they don't make a good work in the
future.
- we put the maintainer out of the loop
The maintainer need not do anything. Maybe he don't know the
translation. The user only use this. This need only the
translators.
I don't propose one of this excesses now. I post a proposal with both
sites.
Gruss
Grisu
--
Michael Bramer - a Debian Linux Developer http://www.debian.org
PGP: finger grisu@db.debian.org -- Linux Sysadmin -- Use Debian Linux
«Computers are like air conditioners -- they stop working properly if i
you open WINDOWS»
Attachment:
pgpDcPs21gz1I.pgp
Description: PGP signature