On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 09:43:26AM +0100, Klaus Reimer wrote:
> > You get the point. IMHO It's just more convenient to have it all in one
> > "friendly" script.
> No, I still don't see it. Init.d-Replacement-Scripts for supervices
> init.d-services are ok for me (because compatibility to some scripts and
> programs using these init.d-scripts to control the service) but I still don't
> agree to add init.d-scripts to native supervise-services.
Well, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I intend to have init scripts
for my packages. As long as there is nothing in policy that says you to have
them in yours, make them however you like.
Adam McKenna <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>