Re: RFC: new task-science package
On 12-Dec-00, 09:42 (CST), "Michael A. Miller" <mmiller3@iupui.edu> wrote:
> >>>>> "Steve" == Steve Greenland <stevegr@debian.org> writes:
>
> > Again, this seems like a lot of detail to inflict on a
> > first time user (who is supposedly who the task- packages
> > are aimed at).
>
>
> As I think about it more, it seems that the real value of a task
> package is that it is specific, not general. That leads me to
> the conclusion that more tasks is better.
If they need to be that specific, then they are not aimed at the general
user, and should not be task-* packages, they should be general meta
packages.
steve
--
Steve Greenland <stevegr@debian.org>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)
Reply to: