Re: Bug#62352: usr/doc and /usr/share/doc confusion
Josip Rodin wrote:
> > However, we should expect that a package would either completely
> > implement policy pre-3.0 (ie /usr/doc), or 3.0 (/usr/share/doc
> > with /usr/doc symlink), and not some combination. I would like to see
> > packages missing /usr/doc (either way) be fixed. It is very annoying.
> Of course. A package must follow one Policy version at a time, not
> several. I'd say that warrants an upload in frozen.
Ok, so can we consider these RC? If so, I'd love to go compile a list of
all the packages that have this problem, file RC bugs, and then perform a
series of NMU's to ensure that *every* package in potato has a
/usr/doc/<package> directory or symlink.
see shy jo