Re: Bug#62352: usr/doc and /usr/share/doc confusion
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 12:30:24PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Yes, because it was a major Policy change, and Lintian demands conformance
> to the latest policy. Hopefully we'll have Policy 3.x compliance a reason
> to file RC bugs against woody packages, so that will get fixed sooner.
However, we should expect that a package would either completely
implement policy pre-3.0 (ie /usr/doc), or 3.0 (/usr/share/doc
with /usr/doc symlink), and not some combination. I would like to see
packages missing /usr/doc (either way) be fixed. It is very annoying.
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>